Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

World's first baby born with three parents

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • World's first baby born with three parents

    I was not sure to post this under new discoveries OR doctrines of demons.

    Genesis 2

    24 That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.

    God created man and then a woman for him. The TWO are to become one flesh, or bring forth a baby that has half of her DNA and half of his DNA. The TWO become one flesh, or one baby.

    NOT the three become one flesh. This will bring forth terrible consequences.


    https://www.yahoo.com/news/worlds-fi...175637487.html

    World's first baby born from 3-parent technique: report

    Kerry Sheridan,AFP 7 hours ago

    Miami (AFP) - The world's first baby has been born using a controversial new technique by US scientists to include DNA from three parents in the embryo, said a report.

    The baby boy was born five months ago in Mexico to Jordanian parents, and is healthy and doing well, said the report in New Scientist magazine, described as an "exclusive."

    The boy's mother carried genes for a disorder known as Leigh Syndrome, a fatal nervous system disorder which she had passed on to her two previous children who both died of the disease.

    She had also suffered four miscarriages.

    The woman, whose identity was withheld by New Scientist, and her husband sought the help of John Zhang, a doctor from the New Hope Fertility Center in New York City to have a baby that would be genetically related to them but would not carry the inherited disease.

    The United States has not approved any three-parent method for fertility purposes, so Zhang went to Mexico where he was quoted by New Scientist as saying "there are no rules."

    One method that has been approved in the United Kingdom, called pronuclear transfer, was deemed unacceptable to the couple because it would involve the destruction of two embryos, said the report.

    Since the mother carried the genes for the disease in her mitochondria, or DNA that is passed down from the maternal side, Zhang used her nuclear DNA and combined it with mitochondria from an egg donor, in a technique known as spindle nuclear transfer.

    "He removed the nucleus from one of the mother's eggs and inserted it into a donor egg that had had its own nucleus removed," said the report.

    "The resulting egg - with nuclear DNA from the mother and mitochondrial DNA from a donor - was then fertilized with the father's sperm."

    - Presentation next month -

    Zhang and his team are expected to describe their method at the American Society for Reproductive Medicine meeting in Salt Lake City, Utah, next month.

    An abstract describing the research has been published in the journal Fertility and Sterility, but outside experts said much more remains to be understood about the research.

    "As this technology is controversial and a world first, I think the investigators should have submitted a manuscript for full peer review instead of announcing these outcomes in this manner," said Justin St John, professor and Director of the Centre for Genetic Diseases at Monash University.

    Attempts began in the 1990s to create a baby by injecting mitochondrial DNA from a donor into the mother's egg, and adding sperm from her partner.

    "Some of the babies went on to develop genetic disorders, and the technique was banned," said the New Scientist report.

    "The problem may have arisen from the babies having mitochondria from two sources."

    Another outside expert, David Clancy, a lecturer at Lancaster University, recalled that experiments in monkeys have shown that maternal mitochondrial DNA can expand from low levels to significantly higher levels, "which would allow disease to again be transmitted, so we must expect the possibility in humans."

    For now, Zhang and his team said the boy's mitochondria has been tested and "they found that less than 1 percent carry the mutation," said the report.

    "Hopefully, this is too low to cause any problems; generally it is thought to take around 18 per cent of mitochondria to be affected before problems start."

    In addition, his being a boy ensures that he could not pass down any inherited mitochondrial DNA.

    "While we should remain vigilant about this technique as new information and research accumulates, let us hope this child grows up and has a long healthy life, said Clancy.

    WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT THIS ?

  • #2
    I do not understand why no one has replied to this and very few have even read it.

    Genesis 2 24 That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.

    How do we identify one flesh, or body from another. We use fingerprints, eye retina, or DNA.

    But Identical twins have the same fingerprints, eye retina, and DNA. So even that does not tell the difference between one flesh from another.

    I knew two identical twins in High School. I could not tell them apart from looking at them. BUT their close friends could tell them apart from the way they acted. Their SOULS were not the same.

    So a husband and wife can never become one flesh by a marriage ceremony, or even sexual intercourse. Their souls are two souls and NOT one. Proof of this is that salvation is sometimes for the wife and not the husband or the other way around.

    That is NOT what The Lord is talking about in the above verse.

    There is one and only one way for a husband and wife to become one flesh.

    That is to birth a baby.

    That baby will have half of the husband's DNA and half of the woman's DNA.

    The two become one flesh. The two souls bring forth another one soul. The two become one.

    BUT for three to become one flesh is a rebellion like the rebellion of Babylon.

    If God will not bless this couple with a baby, they will make one another way other than the way He commanded.

    This is a rebellion that will result in a world wide curse if it grows.

    WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT THIS ?
    Last edited by Lou Newton; September 29, 2016, 09:45 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Gen 6:5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
      Gen 6:6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.

      Gen 6:11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence [unrighteousness, iniquity].
      Gen 6:12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
      Gen 6:13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence [unrighteousness, iniquity] through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

      What shall we do with man who provokes the Lord a second time in similitude after the angels?

      I've read quite a bit about what the mad scientists are doing. They've already created laws (corporate by-laws) to define the requirements for sentience, and grant their abominable corrupted hybrids legal personhood. The other edge of that sword is that many natural God-made humans will not meet the minimum requirements.

      Woe unto the inhabitants of the earth.

      Comment


      • #4
        So many naive people want these advances. The cures, the enhancements. I believe most are okay with it because they don't know "how the sausage is made". If they knew the details, many may still be okay with it. But if they had to get personal with the horror they would crack. We are too sheltered, too buffered from the cost of life and humaneness that this endeavor exacts.

        These completely reckless megalomaniacs are coming out of the woodwork. They are getting grants and being hired by private corporations. Some surely get into DoD and DARPA ultrablack budget projects. This thing in Mexico is what is done in view of the public. I cannot imagine what they do in their dark slimy putrid caves that we never hear about. Those with the beast's mark in their foreheads are desperate to live on at any cost, so what wouldn't they be willing to do? David Rockefeller is 101 years old, and just got his seventh heart transplant. Lord forgive me, but my first thought was who did he murder to harvest it? The doc advised my 78 year old grandfather not to even think about heart bypass surgery at his age. My point is these ultra-rich highly demonizes satanists believe they're on the verge of some kind of "immortality", and they have doubled down on atrocity and unscrupulousness. So quite aptly, woe unto the inhabitants of the earth.

        Yet we are not to fear what is coming on the earth, but lift up our eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh our help. If it is given to us, by the Lord, to put a stop to this lunacy I will rejoice, Hallelujah!

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks for the replies Barry.

          People want to trust in everything BUT Christ.

          They do not want to bother to read that whole Bible to seek the Truth and ask Him what they must do to be saved.

          There is Only One Lifeboat that will save, and that is Christ.

          When we speak against the boat they are in, they get angry.

          No one should get angry at anyone who speaks against anything, for they should not be trusting in it. But proof that they are trusting in something other than Christ, is when they get angry when it is spoken against. That proves that is the lifeboat they are in.

          Wednesday I was busy mowing a persons large lawn. I was on the tractor too long and my back went out. I have been working to get it back in shape.

          I was busy yesterday trying to help settle a dispute between two bothers. I was gone from 9 AM to 10 PM.

          Today I had to replace some front suspension and steering parts of my car. It was a really difficult job and I am really tired.

          Comment


          • #6
            Amen, Lou.

            That is a busy week you had there! You take it easy on my brother.

            Comment

            Working...
            X